Fone Bone
Matt Zimmer
Game Of Thrones "Winterfell"
That was a lot to digest but my first iron-clad impression is that Daenerys is not as good at the politics thing as she thinks she is. I still think she'll win the Game of Thrones, but she makes it SO hard for herself with her righteousness. Jon Snow's biggest strength as a leader, which is perhaps something even Ned Stark didn't have, is his ability to see nuance. He didn't execute people if he didn't have to to make a statement. He was comfortable both in the power he had and the power he was willing to give up. Executing the Tarleys was the biggest of unforced errors on Dany's end. Yeah, the Tarleys sucked, but their one decent son was Jon's best friend. She didn't bother to find out that background before she did it, or even contemplate there would be consequences to her doing it. Sam would not have been inclined to EVER tell Jon the truth if he didn't have a personal reason to believe Dany shouldn't be trusted with power. And the reason he believes that is now a reason that Jon agrees with him about. He is going to be upset with Daenerys. The whole Heir to the Iron Throne thing doesn't REALLY matter to him. But Sam raised a very fair question: Jon was willing to give up his crown to unite the realms for the good of the north. Is Daenerys a good enough person to do the same thing for him? I personally don't think she is but I don't see this as being as huge of a problem family wise as the writers think I might. On some level they want me to be grossed out they're cousins and doing it. But Jaime raped his sister with no consequences whatsoever. It's amazing what things the writers will think upset me and what things won't.
But just based on the twincest I don't think a marriage alliance between Jon and Dany is out of the question, cousins or not. They could conceivably have a fairytale ending. The only question is whether Daenyrus would ever accept it. It would actually be a smart and prudent move on her end which is why I don't see her doing it. But things would have been a LOT easier for her if she hadn't executed Sam's family for essentially "neener neener neener".
I have to give props to Dany for at least having the courtesy to admit what she did to Sam's family in person, in the moment. But again, that's probably poor planning and not thinking about the consequences. It's admirable either way though.
Speaking of bogus executions, Cersei telling Euron Greyjoy that she has had people executed for less isn't a brag or a statement of fierce badassery. It's a sign of weakness and incompetence. Basically only fascists, and stupid fascists at that, execute people for rudeness. And this again brings me back uncomfortably to Daenerys. Granted a public rebuke does deserve a stern response. But going overboard was a sign of weakness not strength.
I love that Arya likes the dragons. Also liked that she defended Sansa and that she's happy to see Gendry too.
I don't agree with Sansa about much in this episode, and for sure her intelligence is overstated by Arya. But when she slams Tyrion by saying "I used to think you were the cleverest man I ever met," it doesn't matter if she's wrong about everything else, she's right that Tyrion is an idiot to trust Cersei. As seen in last season's finale, Cersei immediately went back on her word and betrayed everybody. I will never buy Sansa as the master manipulator in the Game of Thrones. But she doesn't have to be to understand Cersei is full of crap. Why doesn't Tyrion?
To be honest, that was a reunion I was looking forward to. Didn't go as cordially as I'd like, but it could have gone worse. I like Sansa saying Joffrey's wedding had it's moments. I am not sorry that little turd is gone either.
I was very worried about the boy tree climber at the beginning. Little kid climbers don't do well on this show.
Speaking of which, I think the show is crazy to ask me to sympathize with Jaime's guilt regarding Bran. I can understand that there is nuance to the Kingslayer stuff. But it's like Jamie is the worst redemption story the writers could give us otherwise. Forget the fact that he raped his sister so casually for a moment. He pushed an innocent kid out of a window and crippled him. Why should I ever give two craps about his guilt or his remorse? There are plenty of killers in prison who regret their actions. I don't think Oz would have been wise to turn their prisoners into heroic leading men we were supposed to admire.
It's interesting they completely revamped the main title for the last season. It makes sense because the entire landscape is now different, but the effects look much more computer generated and less hand-made than the earlier titles. It weird that they look less realistic than effects made nearly ten years ago. But as spiffy and professional as they are, they also are missing a great deal of the authentic medieval feel that first pop-up titles had.
Bronn and the naked women is the precise reason I often hate this show, and don't take it the least bit seriously. I supposed I should, but as long as it always does that, I can't. It's added nothing to either the story or the characters. It was simply designed to get the male viewers horny. I think there is definitely a place in society for soft-core cable porn. But I don't have to take it seriously.
I love the fact that Yara headbutts Theon upon him freeing her, and then they're cool. I love that. I especially love how understanding she is at him wanting to go back to Winterfell to fight for the Starks. The Greyjoys are a pretty miserable lineage. Theon and Yara are the only two decent ones, and frankly it's a stretch to even call Theon decent. He just doesn't look so sucky compared to his father and brother.
Varys is right about something. Tyrion is high and mighty about the ethics of torture and right and wrong. And yet he can't stop making cruel eunuch jokes. I'm supposed to think he's the good Lannister but I don't think he's all that good, or at least all that nice.
If Bronn takes Cersei up on her mission to kill Jamie and Tyrion, he's nuts. Not just because Cersei holds the losing hand in the Game of Thrones. It's that anyone who does that to her own brothers would do it to anyone, assassins she might want to disavow included. Cersei biggest weakness is that she has a stunning lack of friends because she's betrayed and killed them all. Bronn is not stupid. Surely he's noticed that, just based on what she is asking him to do. I resent the idea that Cersei is on the Iron Throne for the simple fact that she's almost as poor a planner as Stannis, and unlike Stannis has no good people in her ear. It's unfair somebody this stupid currently sits on the Iron Throne. She sucks as much as her son did.
That was an interesting premiere. Like last season, a lot happened in a short space of time. The show doesn't feel the need to pad things out or dawdle when the characters are already together and it's better for it. ****.
That was a lot to digest but my first iron-clad impression is that Daenerys is not as good at the politics thing as she thinks she is. I still think she'll win the Game of Thrones, but she makes it SO hard for herself with her righteousness. Jon Snow's biggest strength as a leader, which is perhaps something even Ned Stark didn't have, is his ability to see nuance. He didn't execute people if he didn't have to to make a statement. He was comfortable both in the power he had and the power he was willing to give up. Executing the Tarleys was the biggest of unforced errors on Dany's end. Yeah, the Tarleys sucked, but their one decent son was Jon's best friend. She didn't bother to find out that background before she did it, or even contemplate there would be consequences to her doing it. Sam would not have been inclined to EVER tell Jon the truth if he didn't have a personal reason to believe Dany shouldn't be trusted with power. And the reason he believes that is now a reason that Jon agrees with him about. He is going to be upset with Daenerys. The whole Heir to the Iron Throne thing doesn't REALLY matter to him. But Sam raised a very fair question: Jon was willing to give up his crown to unite the realms for the good of the north. Is Daenerys a good enough person to do the same thing for him? I personally don't think she is but I don't see this as being as huge of a problem family wise as the writers think I might. On some level they want me to be grossed out they're cousins and doing it. But Jaime raped his sister with no consequences whatsoever. It's amazing what things the writers will think upset me and what things won't.
But just based on the twincest I don't think a marriage alliance between Jon and Dany is out of the question, cousins or not. They could conceivably have a fairytale ending. The only question is whether Daenyrus would ever accept it. It would actually be a smart and prudent move on her end which is why I don't see her doing it. But things would have been a LOT easier for her if she hadn't executed Sam's family for essentially "neener neener neener".
I have to give props to Dany for at least having the courtesy to admit what she did to Sam's family in person, in the moment. But again, that's probably poor planning and not thinking about the consequences. It's admirable either way though.
Speaking of bogus executions, Cersei telling Euron Greyjoy that she has had people executed for less isn't a brag or a statement of fierce badassery. It's a sign of weakness and incompetence. Basically only fascists, and stupid fascists at that, execute people for rudeness. And this again brings me back uncomfortably to Daenerys. Granted a public rebuke does deserve a stern response. But going overboard was a sign of weakness not strength.
I love that Arya likes the dragons. Also liked that she defended Sansa and that she's happy to see Gendry too.
I don't agree with Sansa about much in this episode, and for sure her intelligence is overstated by Arya. But when she slams Tyrion by saying "I used to think you were the cleverest man I ever met," it doesn't matter if she's wrong about everything else, she's right that Tyrion is an idiot to trust Cersei. As seen in last season's finale, Cersei immediately went back on her word and betrayed everybody. I will never buy Sansa as the master manipulator in the Game of Thrones. But she doesn't have to be to understand Cersei is full of crap. Why doesn't Tyrion?
To be honest, that was a reunion I was looking forward to. Didn't go as cordially as I'd like, but it could have gone worse. I like Sansa saying Joffrey's wedding had it's moments. I am not sorry that little turd is gone either.
I was very worried about the boy tree climber at the beginning. Little kid climbers don't do well on this show.
Speaking of which, I think the show is crazy to ask me to sympathize with Jaime's guilt regarding Bran. I can understand that there is nuance to the Kingslayer stuff. But it's like Jamie is the worst redemption story the writers could give us otherwise. Forget the fact that he raped his sister so casually for a moment. He pushed an innocent kid out of a window and crippled him. Why should I ever give two craps about his guilt or his remorse? There are plenty of killers in prison who regret their actions. I don't think Oz would have been wise to turn their prisoners into heroic leading men we were supposed to admire.
It's interesting they completely revamped the main title for the last season. It makes sense because the entire landscape is now different, but the effects look much more computer generated and less hand-made than the earlier titles. It weird that they look less realistic than effects made nearly ten years ago. But as spiffy and professional as they are, they also are missing a great deal of the authentic medieval feel that first pop-up titles had.
Bronn and the naked women is the precise reason I often hate this show, and don't take it the least bit seriously. I supposed I should, but as long as it always does that, I can't. It's added nothing to either the story or the characters. It was simply designed to get the male viewers horny. I think there is definitely a place in society for soft-core cable porn. But I don't have to take it seriously.
I love the fact that Yara headbutts Theon upon him freeing her, and then they're cool. I love that. I especially love how understanding she is at him wanting to go back to Winterfell to fight for the Starks. The Greyjoys are a pretty miserable lineage. Theon and Yara are the only two decent ones, and frankly it's a stretch to even call Theon decent. He just doesn't look so sucky compared to his father and brother.
Varys is right about something. Tyrion is high and mighty about the ethics of torture and right and wrong. And yet he can't stop making cruel eunuch jokes. I'm supposed to think he's the good Lannister but I don't think he's all that good, or at least all that nice.
If Bronn takes Cersei up on her mission to kill Jamie and Tyrion, he's nuts. Not just because Cersei holds the losing hand in the Game of Thrones. It's that anyone who does that to her own brothers would do it to anyone, assassins she might want to disavow included. Cersei biggest weakness is that she has a stunning lack of friends because she's betrayed and killed them all. Bronn is not stupid. Surely he's noticed that, just based on what she is asking him to do. I resent the idea that Cersei is on the Iron Throne for the simple fact that she's almost as poor a planner as Stannis, and unlike Stannis has no good people in her ear. It's unfair somebody this stupid currently sits on the Iron Throne. She sucks as much as her son did.
That was an interesting premiere. Like last season, a lot happened in a short space of time. The show doesn't feel the need to pad things out or dawdle when the characters are already together and it's better for it. ****.
Last edited: