Home News Tyler “Ninja” Blevins Paid One Million To Play Apex Legends At Launch

Tyler “Ninja” Blevins Paid One Million To Play Apex Legends At Launch

674
12
Ninja Apex Legends

Did Apex Legends really pay Ninja to play it? How much?

When it comes to the launch of a new video game, making sure that you have the right people in place to plug it is essential. And for EA and Respawn Entertainment, they went right to the top of streamers and paid Tyler “Ninja” Blevins one million dollars to play their game Apex Legends during its launch period. For real.

That amount of money is staggering, and proof of the power of Ninja’s influence on his viewers. To be clear, he wasn’t the only one roped into this “event’, but he was one of the big ones.

And it worked, Apex Legends got 10 million downloads in a few days.

The thread view count is 316

12 COMMENTS

  1. No he is being paid a million dollars to advertise a game.

    Yep. Ninja is a huge video game streamer with a large following of kids and teens. He made it big streaming Fortnite and contributed to a good chunk of its playerbase. EA is aware that having a big-name streamer playing Apex Legends would expose it to a lot of potential customers. With that in mind, it’s not hard to see why they would pay him to stream their new game.

    Heck, last year Ninja and a few other popular streamers once decided to stream a game called Realm Royale when Fortnite’s servers were down and caused RR’s playerbase to skyrocket! And they weren’t even paid to play that game.

  2. Nobody should be paid a million dollars to do an ad. Nobody.

    Eh, what EA does with their money to advertise their games is not my concern. If EA thinks that paying a popular streamer a hefty sum to play and advertise their game would give their game a lot of exposure and make it profitable, then let them. It’s not my money and I don’t have stocks in EA. Plus, this is not anti-consumer or offensive.

  3. Eh, what EA does with their money to advertise their games is not my concern. If EA thinks that paying a popular streamer a hefty sum to play and advertise their game would give their game a lot of exposure and make it profitable, then let them. It’s not my money and I don’t have stocks in EA. Plus, this is not anti-consumer or offensive.

    Its friggen EA, they wipe their butts with a million dollars everyday

    Sent from my SM-J727T using Tapatalk

  4. Eh, what EA does with their money to advertise their games is not my concern. If EA thinks that paying a popular streamer a hefty sum to play and advertise their game would give their game a lot of exposure and make it profitable, then let them. It’s not my money and I don’t have stocks in EA. Plus, this is not anti-consumer or offensive.

    It’s offensive to me. There are people starving in Puerto Rico and these knuckleheads are spending a million bucks on nonsense. I don’t think it is okay in the least.

  5. It’s offensive to me. There are people starving in Puerto Rico and these knuckleheads are spending a million bucks on nonsense. I don’t think it is okay in the least.

    Apparently, advertising your game is nonsense. rolls eyes

    Besides, EA is no stranger to giving away millions of dollars to charity and causes. Like PapaGreg said, EA is big and can afford to do things like shell out millions of dollars for advertising and charities.

  6. It’s offensive to me. There are people starving in Puerto Rico and these knuckleheads are spending a million bucks on nonsense. I don’t think it is okay in the least.

    Look EA is a game company and them spending a million dollars on advertisement so they can get their game on the map thereby employing people is one of the least scummy things they have done and believe me EA as a game company is literally the plague.

    Sent from my SM-J727T using Tapatalk

  7. Look EA is a game company and them spending a million dollars on advertisement so they can get their game on the map thereby employing people is one of the least scummy things they have done and believe me EA as a game company is literally the plague.

    Sent from my SM-J727T using Tapatalk

    Yeah. EA has done charities, but there’s also a lot of scummy things EA has done that gets them a lot of justified hate and criticism. Stuff like acquiring game studios for their intellectual properties and then forcing them to make rushed games (often dismantling these studios if their rushed games underperform), putting lootboxes and pay-to-win microtransactions into game franchises that originally lacked those (Like Plants vs Zombies 2 and Star Wars Battlefront 2), and adding one-use online codes to physical copies of games that won’t work without the code.

    Of all the things EA has done, EA having a big marketing budget is not a big deal.