Review Metabee
Who gets stuck with all the bad luck?
Nah to get more viewersThey have FX? If so they won't kill FUEL TV at first place if there is extra Fox channels to run The Simpsons.
Nah to get more viewersThey have FX? If so they won't kill FUEL TV at first place if there is extra Fox channels to run The Simpsons.
Also, FXX wouldn't exist since Simpsons was on Fox Kids.Actually fuel tv is replaced by fox sports, fox soccer is the one that got replaced by fxx
well fxx is going to exist anyways, we saw friends and mom on too many networksAlso, FXX wouldn't exist since Simpsons was on Fox Kids.
I don't think The Simpsons would fit well in Fox Kids and some of episodes are TV-14.Also, FXX wouldn't exist since Simpsons was on Fox Kids.
I know why - it is because of PTC and they were very strong in 2000s and they filed endless of complaints over contents in virtually every TV shows and movies - lead to broadcast decay eventually.Maybe on an adult swim type block or Fox Family. Heck, some Fox Kids international channels aired the simpsons!
Remember, despite its failings, Fox Family did good in some departments. It shot up kid ratings during the early years and won with tweens during the latter years. If it wasn’t sold off, it probably wouldn’t be as big as Nick or Disney, but it would probably be higher than some of the other kids channels.
Federal law require broadcast network to air minimum 3 hours worth of E/I within specific hours when children are viewing, but decline of live TV, nobody want to watch E/I anymore, so federal law needs to be repealed or modified to allow any children programming, even if they aren't E/I.Sunday mornings are for E/I
The worst part is you are rightFederal law require broadcast network to air minimum 3 hours worth of E/I within specific hours when children are viewing, but decline of live TV, nobody want to watch E/I anymore, so federal law needs to be repealed or modified to allow any children programming, even if they aren't E/I.
We as members in here know more than politicians, sadly.
I think haim saban should just retired from the entertainment industry by selling his studio that is saban entertainment and his stake in fox family worldwide to news corporation/fox, maybe haim saban would return to the entertainment industry by dubbing animes instead of producing shows like power rangersSaban was the smaller partner in the joint-venture even though they owned around half, although they were a big content contributor to Fox Family, its size hindered the development and investment in the channel, the channel struggled to make a profit and had a debt problem.
If Fox had the appetite to have taken on Fox Family as a wholly owned channel and buy out Saban Entertainment completely, Fox would've use its huge resources and funds to make something good of it.
that why Murdoch should focus on buying fox family worldwide before buying directv, I think 2004, 2005 or 2006 would have been a perfect year for news corp to buy directvMurdoch was focusing on buying out DirecTV as it seemed to be a more worthwhile investment than keeping Fox Family Worldwide.
but competition is a good thing from what I heardThere are strong competition in children programming - Nick, Disney and CN.
well there are the filmation cartoons based on fox films like journey to the center of the earth and fantastic voyage, Arizona fox animation studios films (most notable anatastia) and at the time fourthcoming blue sky studios films and they did have terrytoons but they only have the distribution rights, viacomcbs owned terrytoons (its a shame, I wish fox has a looney tunes/terrytoons/walt Lantz/those screen gems cartoons esque cartoon series)Beside Saban, Fox didn't have many recognizable brands that are suitable for children and Fox didn't believe that buy Saban will help everything to beat 3 major channels - Nick, CN and Disney. It will make Saban, Fox Kids and Fox Family less valuable and Fox will lose the money if it wasn't sell in 2001.
At beginning, yes but not at end, the strong competition threw Fox Kids out as Fox was unable to beat Nick - it was very powerful channel at that time, secondly, CN and thirdly, Disney.but competition is a good thing from what I heard
but in 2001, children programming wasn't part of Fox's strategy that they used to be in 1990, unfortunately.well there are the filmation cartoons based on fox films like journey to the center of the earth and fantastic voyage, Arizona fox animation studios films (most notable anatastia) and at the time fourthcoming blue sky studios films and they did have terrytoons but they only have the distribution rights, viacomcbs owned terrytoons (its a shame, I wish fox has a looney tunes/terrytoons/walt Lantz/those screen gems cartoons esque cartoon series)
well i think 2002 would have been a revival of fox strategy with children programing with the launch of blue sky studios,fox finally bought haim saban stake in fox family worldwide (meant they not only bought back fox children productions but also bought Saban Entertainment) and fox producing children programming againAt beginning, yes but not at end, the strong competition threw Fox Kids out as Fox was unable to beat Nick - it was very powerful channel at that time, secondly, CN and thirdly, Disney.
Disney Channel wasn't available as basic cable to some cable companies like Time Warner and Comcast at that time in 2000.
but in 2001, children programming wasn't part of Fox's strategy that they used to be in 1990, unfortunately.
well fox kids/family did have game shows at one time here are the images:If Nick was unpopular so Fox will have solid case to expand the Fox Kids further, so they won't have to sell to Disney. Nick was struggle back in early 1980s when they used pinball but got much improved after game shows and Nicktoons shows came in early 1990s.
If you ask me - Nick killed Fox Kids? My answer will be yes.
Blue Sky Studios was very new back in 2002 and first movie was Ice Age, but successful of Ice Age doesn't reflect that children programming on TV will be successful and next film didn't occur until 2005 when Robots released. The TV market is more complicated for Fox and if Fox Kids/Fox Family didn't well at end, so Blue Sky Studios won't if it was for TV. Fox tried this and rating wasn't well, so Fox is done with children programming on TV after that. Disney tried with Pixar and it wasn't pretty back in 2001, also Fox saw about what happened with Pixar, so they didn't bother to revive.well i think 2002 would have been a revival of fox strategy with children programing with the launch of blue sky studios,fox finally bought haim saban stake in fox family worldwide (meant they not only bought back fox children productions but also bought Saban Entertainment) and fox producing children programming again