that because universal owns woody woodpeckerMy question is. Why didn't Woody Woodpecker air on Jetix/ABC Family
ABC Family worldwide still had the rights
that because universal owns woody woodpeckerMy question is. Why didn't Woody Woodpecker air on Jetix/ABC Family
ABC Family worldwide still had the rights
Universal own New Woody Woodpecker Show and they only had broadcast agreement with Fox Kids until show ended and end of Fox Kids, so it moved to CN for re-run this shows.My question is. Why didn't Woody Woodpecker air on Jetix/ABC Family
ABC Family worldwide still had the rights
Proof it was on CN?Universal own New Woody Woodpecker Show and they only had broadcast agreement with Fox Kids until show ended and end of Fox Kids, so it moved to CN for re-run this shows.
They did for short time - <i>The New Woody Woodpecker Show</i>Proof it was on CN?
Probably same.what if in another timeline we got fox kids as channel like the one in the europe/Latin America/australia instead of fox family. would that be better or worst?
as in the worst thing but still the betterProbably same.
May not but the different name should be coupled with management changes, so it will help a lot.as in the worst thing but still the better
well they have the studio who producing the shows: saban entertainment and they have the Paris divisionMay not but the different name should be coupled with management changes, so it will help a lot.
If Fox got new idea and order to produce new animated shows that are popular to children like Nick did with Nicktoons, so it will be much better than Fox did to Fox Family, also acquirement of popular shows that rarely or no longer air on 3 big kid network (Nick, CN, Disney) do help.
I agreedWe need better antitrust laws to protect Fox from getting killed by strong competition, so it need to have fair competition. WB made Looney Tunes as exclusive on CN violate the antitrust so if I was judge, I would force WB to issue non-exclusive licensing to air on different networks at fair price.
It is better if Fox has own animation TV studio, but they shut it down after one movie flopped.well they have the studio who producing the shows: saban entertainment and they have the Paris division
I wish fox television animation founded in 1987 (the same year blue sky studios founded) or 1988 or 1989 (the same year the Simpsons aired) so fox can produce shows for not only for adults but also for the kids and familiesIt is better if Fox has own animation TV studio, but they shut it down after one movie flopped.
but I don't think that year is matter and Fox needs to do better with children programming, even if started in 1987 as you mentioned and it could be unsuccessful if Fox went with same management and sell to Disney eventually.I wish fox television animation founded in 1987 (the same year blue sky studios founded) or 1988 or 1989 (the same year the Simpsons aired) so fox can produce shows for not only for adults but also for the kids and families
edit: you referring to fox animation Arizona (now replaced by 20th century fox animation)
there's a tv animation division but that only produced the Simpsons and family guy
but hey at least we would have gotten fox kids animated sports shows that are better (or even worst) then nickelodeon did for animated sports shows like nfl rush zone and wild glidersFox failed themselves and they heavily relied on sports, so they may make animated sport shows, whoa lol.
or Fox News make animated political shows to teach kids how to write a letter to the Congress or state legislature lol.but hey at least we have gotten fox kids animated sports shows that are better (or even worst) then nickelodeon did for animated sports shows like nfl rush zone and wild gliders
ok ok, we going as far as political we goor Fox News make animated political shows to teach kids how to write a letter to the Congress or state legislature lol.
It was joke, anyway.ok ok, we going as far as political we go
or fox would convert fox family to fox kids and be like the europe, Latin America and australia versions instead of sell to disneyso Fox would convert Fox Family to Fox Sports Channel instead of sell to Disney.
I'm just speaking about reality - there is consequence if CBN didn't include a condition and restriction with former Family Channel when sold to Fox, so there is no doubt that Fox will convert and rename to sport channel instead of sell to Disney. Fox Kids and Fox Family already failed back in 2001, so I just said about scenario in 2001.or fox would convert fox family to fox kids and be like the europe, Latin America and australia versions instead of sell to disney
I think the reason why disney bought fox was for the x men and fantastic four rights and also huluI'm just speaking about reality - there is consequence if CBN didn't include a condition and restriction with former Family Channel when sold to Fox, so there is no doubt that Fox will convert and rename to sport channel instead of sell to Disney. Fox Kids and Fox Family already failed back in 2001, so I just said about scenario in 2001.
Even if Fox rename to Fox Kids Channel in 2001 and it will sold to Disney eventually, but at beginning, CBN require to have "Family" name for channel like Fox Family and ABC Family. CBN's restriction with name appear to be no longer in force when Disney renamed to Freeform.
No one know about what happened to Marvel in 90s and early 2000s and Disney didn't buy until 2009.I think the reason why disney bought fox was for the x men and fantastic four rights and also hulu
I think fox could have sold x men and fantastic four rights instead of the whole thing
I think fox could just reboot power rangers if fox would bought saban (the creators of the power rangers) and make it the x men replacement like hasbro doing with the power rangers right now,